Blood for Dracula (1974)

Throughout the 1960s and early 1970s artist Andy Warhol branched out into film making, largely with the assistance of director Paul Morrissey.  I say that because, if you came searching for this movie under its larger release title of Andy Warhol's Dracula, you are going to be sorely disappointed to find out that Warhol neither starred nor directed this film.  Morrissey and Joe Dallessandro were part of his inner circle, so you might say that Morrissey's films were large inspired by his aesthetic, although the main Warhol contribution is a (small) infusion of cash.

That said, this was done largely to cash in on the underground success of Flesh for Frankenstein, also known as Andy Warhol's Frankenstein, which had been released a year prior and also directed by Morrissey.  Filming had gone well, so they decided to do another one and take advantage of filming locations in Italy. 

Count Dracula (Udo Kier) is dying.  He needs an infusion of virgin blood, something he can't get in Romania because everyone knows who he is.  He leaves his sister to her own fate and, at the insistence of his servant Anton (Arno Juerging), go to Italy to find a good Catholic girl that has been reserving herself for marriage.

They find what they are looking for in the Di Fiore family.  The Marchese (Vittorio De Sica) and Marchesa (Maxime McKendry) are cash poor.  All the servants have left except handyman Mario Balato (Dallessandro), who seems to hang around largely to get at two of the daughters, Saphiria (Dominique Darel) and Rubinia (Stefania Casini), who also have a thing for each other.  The elder Di Fiores are excited when the Count shows up, hoping that a marriage to one of their daughters will replenish their coffers.

Problem is, Mario does not want to give up the sisters to an aristocrat, as he has dreams of the coming proletariat revolution that will bring him equality and allow him to marry into the family.  He also becomes suspicious of the Count due to his illness and the fact they brought a very light coffin with them, which has been relegated to the family chapel, thus not allowing Dracula to get his proper rest.

Dracula also finds out in turn that neither Saphiria and Rubinia are virgins, as their blood causes him to get violently ill.  The eldest, Esmeralda (Milena Vukotic) is also unmarried, but makes no bones about the point that she once had a fiancee.  It turns out the only virgin left is 14-year-old Perla (Silvia Dionisio), who is too young for marriage.  The Count decides that he must feed anyway, leading Mario to attempt to deflower Perla himself and put an end to Dracula once and for all.

I got the feeling early on that the film was supposed to be more comedy than horror.  The campy acting is highly exaggerated and Morrissey takes every opportunity to show the two "bad" sisters and Dallessandro naked as much as possible.  Problem is, there are a number of rape overtones that really kill much of the delight that the over-the-top sexuality would have. It also makes the ending quite disturbing despite the fact that it has one of the best Dracula deaths of all the movies made about him.

It is almost as if this movie was made to imitate a John Waters film and, in fact, it probably would have worked much better if someone like Waters was at the helm.  His early films dealt with scatology, deviant sexuality and all sorts of disturbing themes, but it was always playful.  Morrissey, on the other hand, seems to be glorifying sexual assault and rape in numerous scenes.  I don't know how that worked for an audience in the '70s, but for modern audiences it takes one right out of a film, even a silly one like this, in the same way overt racism does.

That's quite a shame, because Kier is great as Dracula, the daughters are beautiful and Arno Juerging's overacting is absolutely hilarious.  I do understand why people like this, as once you understand that it is not a serious horror film it would normally be no problem to sit back and enjoy it.

Blood for Dracula (1974)
Time: 103 minutes
Starring: Udo Kier, Anton Juerging, Joe Dallessandro
Director: Paul Morrissey

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Lawnmower Man (1992)

Image
Virtual reality has been one of the most hyped, and one of the most disappointing, promises of technology.  While it promotes immersion into a cybernetic world what it really provides are video games with 20-year-old graphics and the occasional bruise when one accidentally hits a closet door.  In the case of The Lawnmower Man  what it is promising is that something with graphics just a little bit better than Dire Straits's "Money for Nothing" video will somehow change the world and alter humanity. It was laughable then and it is laughable now.  The only person not laughing was Stephen King, who demanded that his name be removed from all future advertising for the movie because he never wrote this.  The story, of which a short film was made in the 1980s, involves a man unwittingly hiring a Greek god to mow his lawn and, after said god creates a spectacle, paying for the landscaping with his life.  It's only a few pages and, in my opinion, it is one of King's worst
Read more

Things (1989)

Image
Most of the time when I hear a movie is the worst ever I know that is hyperbole. There are few candidates and I would even say the famous book chronicling the worst movies ever made got it wrong.  Plan 9 from Outer Space is laughably incompetent, but enjoyable.  The worst kind of films are the ones where no joy can be found in the watching experience, for reasons ranging from unlikeable characters to just sheer boredom.  A truly horrible movie is something like  Things.   This is a 1989 direct-to-video horror film from Canada, filmed on 8mm and dubbed once it was completed and the makers realized most of the sound was unusable.  Director Andrew Jordan and writer Barry J. Gillis managed to grab porn star Amber Lynn for an hour to shoot her as a news reporter just so they could put her face on the video box.  Most of the music was done by Gillis, and some of it by a local band called Familiar Strangers.  It was filmed in large part in Andrew Norman's basement, and most of the props w
Read more

The Omen (1976)

Image
A movie does not have to be high art to strike a chord with the public.  The Omen was an attempt by writer David Seltzer to make some money and get a nice trip to the UK.  It just so happened that because of The Exorcist the public was hungry for more movies involving demons and such, and adding a veneer of Catholicism didn't hurt either.  The Vatican's secrets are most likely of more interest to scholars than anyone else, but a religion doesn't hang on over the centuries without creating a bit of mystery.  In this case, Seltzer settled on the Revelation of St. John, the low-fantasy portion of the Bible and, instead of an hilariously named (albeit historically correct) demon named Pazuzu, with The Omen we get the son of Satan himself.  When Robert Thorne (Gregory Peck) is informed that his child has died he visits a priest at the hospital in Rome where his wife is coalescing.  He is given an offer too good to be true: a foundling, whose mother died in childbirth, was born
Read more