Poltergeist (1982)

If you want to know why we have such a horrible, lifeless film rating these days as PG-13, it's because of this movie, Gremlins and Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.  After the MPAA initiated a rating system in the late 1960s, almost everyone was content that a PG-rated film may contain nudity, an f-word or two and a fair amount of violence.  Then, the 1980s came, and with it fake moral outrage through "parental advocacy groups" about everything from movies to music.  Temple of Doom had a beating heart being removed from a sacrificial victim, Gremlins had one of the eponymous creatures blown up in a microwave and Poltergeist had a guy hallucinating about peeling his face off.  All of this quite tame when you look at many PG movies that came before it, but, if you yell loud enough, someone gives you a sucker to shut you up.  Thus, PG-13.

To be fair, there is nothing limp or lifeless about this story of a suburban family suddenly set upon by angry ghosts.  Directed by Tobe Hooper (although there is quite a bit of evidence that Hooper's name was used to hide the fact that producer Steven Spielberg didn't want to get caught directing this and E.T.: The Extraterrestrial at the same time), Poltergeist manages to be an intense and, sometimes, frightening film despite the only death in the entire thing being a bird.

Steve (Craig T. Nelson) and Diane Freeling (JoBeth Williams) are living in a house in a subdivision that Steve is almost single-handedly responsible for selling out.  They live with their teenage daughter Dana (Dominique Dunne), son Robbie (Oliver Robins) and their youngest, Carole Anne (Heather O'Rourke).  One night Steve awakes and finds Carole Anne in front of the TV, looking at the static and appearing to be talking to voices that she is hearing.  Her mother asks her about it the next morning, and she responds that the "TV people" were talking to her.  Shortly afterward, strange phenomena begins.  At first amusing, it soon results in Robbie being pulled through his window as a tree in the yard attempts to devour him.  It turns out, however, that this is a distraction so that the ghosts can lure Carole Anne through a portal in her closet and take her to the other side.

Carole Anne's room quickly becomes a whirlwind of activity, and in an attempt to get their daughter back and stop the goings on they contact a group of psychics who, in turn, decide what she really needs is the help of Tangina (Zelda Rubenstein), a medium known for "cleaning" houses.  Their efforts succeed in getting Carole Anne back, but it turns out that the ghosts, led by some otherworldly beast, aren't done with them yet.

While some of the scares and activity are played humorously, but so much happens within the last 15 minutes of the film it is almost a sensory overload.  Objects thrown about, a manifestation of the beast itself and corpses rocketing up from the ground are just a few of the things the Freelings (and the audience) experience toward the end. 

Everyone knows this is a classic horror film by now.  You have seen it on retrospectives, talked about (especially with those of us who role their eyes at the uselessness of doing a remake).  In some ways everything good that happened here was negated by two awful sequels.  So, in retrospect, does this original film still stand up?  Surprisingly, yes.  It is definitely a film of its time, but if you take it as a document of something happening to a typical 1980s American family, much of that dated look can be excused.  As for the effects, some still work brilliantly (objects flying around, the first time we see the face of the beast) while others are laughable (the tornado when the tree attacks Robbie).  To be honest, the awful effects were awful back in 1982, so it's fair to say the good ones have aged well.  They definitely don't look like cartoons like the CGI of today.

While it definitely earns its reputation as being a great fright movie, if you're looking for blood and guts, this does not live up to the outrage that it caused back in its time.  In truth, rarely does any movie outside of ones purposely designed to do so.  Poltergeist was an attempt by Steven Spielberg to do something a bit different and, while Tobe Hooper may or may not have directed this completely, he at least got paid and we got 1985's Lifeforce.  I know, that movie causes even more controversy among Hooper's fans than this one, but I have always loved it and consider it redemption for people who questioned whether or not he was a competent director. 

Poltergeist (1982)
Time: 114 minutes
Starring: Craig T. Nelson, JoBeth Williams, Heather O'Rourke, Zelda Rubinstein
Director: Tobe Hooper


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Lawnmower Man (1992)

Image
Virtual reality has been one of the most hyped, and one of the most disappointing, promises of technology.  While it promotes immersion into a cybernetic world what it really provides are video games with 20-year-old graphics and the occasional bruise when one accidentally hits a closet door.  In the case of The Lawnmower Man  what it is promising is that something with graphics just a little bit better than Dire Straits's "Money for Nothing" video will somehow change the world and alter humanity. It was laughable then and it is laughable now.  The only person not laughing was Stephen King, who demanded that his name be removed from all future advertising for the movie because he never wrote this.  The story, of which a short film was made in the 1980s, involves a man unwittingly hiring a Greek god to mow his lawn and, after said god creates a spectacle, paying for the landscaping with his life.  It's only a few pages and, in my opinion, it is one of King's worst
Read more

Things (1989)

Image
Most of the time when I hear a movie is the worst ever I know that is hyperbole. There are few candidates and I would even say the famous book chronicling the worst movies ever made got it wrong.  Plan 9 from Outer Space is laughably incompetent, but enjoyable.  The worst kind of films are the ones where no joy can be found in the watching experience, for reasons ranging from unlikeable characters to just sheer boredom.  A truly horrible movie is something like  Things.   This is a 1989 direct-to-video horror film from Canada, filmed on 8mm and dubbed once it was completed and the makers realized most of the sound was unusable.  Director Andrew Jordan and writer Barry J. Gillis managed to grab porn star Amber Lynn for an hour to shoot her as a news reporter just so they could put her face on the video box.  Most of the music was done by Gillis, and some of it by a local band called Familiar Strangers.  It was filmed in large part in Andrew Norman's basement, and most of the props w
Read more

The Omen (1976)

Image
A movie does not have to be high art to strike a chord with the public.  The Omen was an attempt by writer David Seltzer to make some money and get a nice trip to the UK.  It just so happened that because of The Exorcist the public was hungry for more movies involving demons and such, and adding a veneer of Catholicism didn't hurt either.  The Vatican's secrets are most likely of more interest to scholars than anyone else, but a religion doesn't hang on over the centuries without creating a bit of mystery.  In this case, Seltzer settled on the Revelation of St. John, the low-fantasy portion of the Bible and, instead of an hilariously named (albeit historically correct) demon named Pazuzu, with The Omen we get the son of Satan himself.  When Robert Thorne (Gregory Peck) is informed that his child has died he visits a priest at the hospital in Rome where his wife is coalescing.  He is given an offer too good to be true: a foundling, whose mother died in childbirth, was born
Read more