The Revenge of Frankenstein (1958)


The Curse of Frankenstein presented a loose, more violent take on Mary Shelley's story.  It drummed up its share of controversy but, as usual in art, controversy turns out to be a good thing.  Long after the Universal monsters had fallen out of favor Hammer managed to revive one of the best of the series.  By nature it was completely different because, although Shelley's book was public domain, James Whales's film was not. 

The narrative of The Curse of Frankenstein is framed by Victor Frankenstein's (Peter Cushing) story to a priest of why he did what he did.  Rather than blindly obsessive like Henry Frankenstein was in the 1931 movie, Victor is willing to murder to achieve his results and this tendency has him sentenced to death by guillotine - a situation we find him in at the beginning of The Revenge of Frankenstein.

Victor, with the help of a man named Karl (Oscar Quitak), manages to escape death and flee to another city where he sets up practice as Dr. Stein.  When not treating upper class ladies for a variety of ailments he operates a charity hospital for the poor, where his operations provide him with many of the materials he needs to continue on with his work.  When confronted by the town's medical council he is recognized by Dr. Hans Kleve (Francis Matthews) who, instead of turning him in, asks to be his pupil.

As it turns out Victor is still pursuing his goals, but this time apparently to assist Karl, who has been partially paralyzed due to a blood clot.  Frankenstein proposes to put Karl's brain into a new body he has constructed (Michael Gwynn) to free him from his crippled state.  At first it appears to be a success, but after the interference of a well-meaning assistant named Margaret (Eunice Gayson) Karl is set free too early and, after an altercation, becomes dangerously violent.  With Karl on the loose and Victor's identity soon known, he and Kleve must make preparations for what comes next. 

I have to give the writing team, led by Jimmy Sangster, credit for not going the obvious route and remaking Bride of Frankenstein for the second movie.  Since the original ended with what appeared to be Victor marching to his death I am still quite sure that a second film was never intended but, since The Curse of Frankenstein was such a surprise hit in the UK and in the U.S., a sequel became inevitable.  There is no major contrivance when it comes to the escape, only bribery and violence. 

What I did have some issues with were anachronisms that pop up here and there.  I'm pretty sure the sinks featured are about 20 years early, even if not in a private home but in a medical facility, as the main action in this film takes place in 1863.  In fact, Victor and Hans's habit of proper hygiene before surgery would have still been revolutionary, even scoffed at by a number of medical professionals, at the time.  All the usual scientific doo-dads that show up in a Frankenstein movie, however, are easily dismissed, and like any good movie of its type there isn't any long explanation about how any of it works other than "science."

Peter Cushing, when playing a bad guy, often is great at understated evil, and here is no exception.  Also, we don't have a lumbering, crazed beast in the monster, but rather an intelligent man who is feeling betrayed as he realizes that, even after trading bodies, he's still going to be an object to be stared at rather than treated like a real human being.  Eunice Gayson is wasted as a plot contrivance, but at least they didn't try to make her a love interest for Hans, although there is obviously some unrequited interest on Karl's part. 

Terence Fisher as usual uses his budget and solid directorial skills to good measure, and the set design is wonderful as expected.  It is a bit bloodier than most of what one would expect in 1958, but it managed to make it to the screens as Fisher intended, with an ending that proved that older film censorship rules were starting to fall by the wayside.  The best thing is that The Revenge of Frankenstein is not just a retread of Curse, telling a unique story that still allows the film to stand on its own.

The Revenge of Frankenstein (1958)
Time: 90 minutes
Starring: Peter Cushing, Francis Matthews, Michael Gwynn, Oscar Quitak, Eunice Gayson
Director: Terence Fisher

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Lawnmower Man (1992)

Image
Virtual reality has been one of the most hyped, and one of the most disappointing, promises of technology.  While it promotes immersion into a cybernetic world what it really provides are video games with 20-year-old graphics and the occasional bruise when one accidentally hits a closet door.  In the case of The Lawnmower Man  what it is promising is that something with graphics just a little bit better than Dire Straits's "Money for Nothing" video will somehow change the world and alter humanity. It was laughable then and it is laughable now.  The only person not laughing was Stephen King, who demanded that his name be removed from all future advertising for the movie because he never wrote this.  The story, of which a short film was made in the 1980s, involves a man unwittingly hiring a Greek god to mow his lawn and, after said god creates a spectacle, paying for the landscaping with his life.  It's only a few pages and, in my opinion, it is one of King's worst
Read more

Things (1989)

Image
Most of the time when I hear a movie is the worst ever I know that is hyperbole. There are few candidates and I would even say the famous book chronicling the worst movies ever made got it wrong.  Plan 9 from Outer Space is laughably incompetent, but enjoyable.  The worst kind of films are the ones where no joy can be found in the watching experience, for reasons ranging from unlikeable characters to just sheer boredom.  A truly horrible movie is something like  Things.   This is a 1989 direct-to-video horror film from Canada, filmed on 8mm and dubbed once it was completed and the makers realized most of the sound was unusable.  Director Andrew Jordan and writer Barry J. Gillis managed to grab porn star Amber Lynn for an hour to shoot her as a news reporter just so they could put her face on the video box.  Most of the music was done by Gillis, and some of it by a local band called Familiar Strangers.  It was filmed in large part in Andrew Norman's basement, and most of the props w
Read more

The Omen (1976)

Image
A movie does not have to be high art to strike a chord with the public.  The Omen was an attempt by writer David Seltzer to make some money and get a nice trip to the UK.  It just so happened that because of The Exorcist the public was hungry for more movies involving demons and such, and adding a veneer of Catholicism didn't hurt either.  The Vatican's secrets are most likely of more interest to scholars than anyone else, but a religion doesn't hang on over the centuries without creating a bit of mystery.  In this case, Seltzer settled on the Revelation of St. John, the low-fantasy portion of the Bible and, instead of an hilariously named (albeit historically correct) demon named Pazuzu, with The Omen we get the son of Satan himself.  When Robert Thorne (Gregory Peck) is informed that his child has died he visits a priest at the hospital in Rome where his wife is coalescing.  He is given an offer too good to be true: a foundling, whose mother died in childbirth, was born
Read more